<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Next Big Future - Latest Comments in US and China Look at Accelerated Retirement of Inefficient Cars</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/us_and_china_look_at_accelerated_retirement_of_inefficient_cars/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:24:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: US and China Look at Accelerated Retirement of Inefficient Cars</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/01/us-and-china-look-at-accelerated.html#comment-535760133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If CAFE and meeting it was a serious issue, Ford would sell it's new 2012 Ranger in the US. I would immediately trade for a 4 door pickup that gets 30+MPG even if it is a diesel. The US Auto industry only cares about protecting profits. CAFE only justifies raising their prices to add additional dealer (and Mfgr.) income. If our fuel prices equaled those in Europe, the Big 3 would vanish from the landscape.....just like the other dinosaurs did.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kond</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: US and China Look at Accelerated Retirement of Inefficient Cars</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/01/us-and-china-look-at-accelerated.html#comment-530006270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like economics by themselves are effective at ridding inefficient cars. No one wants something inefficient when gas prices are $5 a gallon. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enterprise Car Sales</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>