<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Next Big Future - Latest Comments in Progress to exaflop computers and specialized supercomputers</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/progress_to_exaflop_computers_and_specialized_supercomputers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:01:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Progress to exaflop computers and specialized supercomputers</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/progress-to-exaflop-computers-and.html#comment-1904930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the side effects of Randall Mill's (admittedly controversial) claims is embodied in his Millsian molecular rendering software. The sorts of advances in modeling molecular interactions, combined with an exaflop computer, might really catapult the ability to model biological tissues or simple organisms into reality very quickly. That's one of the reasons I hope Mills is correct, even if I don't give him great odds of being so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brock</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:01:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>