-
Website
http://nextbigfuture.com -
Original page
http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/06/optical-superlens-resolves-30.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
robot_makes_music
39 comments · 1 points
-
Tom_Craver
69 comments · 1 points
-
Soylent
31 comments · 1 points
-
enantiomer2000
81 comments · 2 points
-
gaetanomarano
18 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
J Storrs Hall of Foresight Explains the Medieval Warm Period and Global Warming
2 days ago · 12 comments
-
Swine Flu Has Killed Over 10,000 Americans
1 day ago · 4 comments
-
Argonne Labs Working to Control Casimir Force
1 day ago · 3 comments
-
Blacklight Power Plans for 2010-2013
4 days ago · 11 comments
-
US Deficit Situation 2008, 2010, 2012 and Other Countries
3 days ago · 7 comments
-
J Storrs Hall of Foresight Explains the Medieval Warm Period and Global Warming
I think however that the lenses are presently "scanned" across the surface in order to accumulate the image. Not suitable for microscopes. It is also not apparent whether the claim of long-field imaging holds: it may also be a scanned mechanism.
On the other hand, if the imaging superlens only needed to be jogged a few nanometers in a rectangular raster, then it should be possible to do so at speeds approaching "frames per second" rates using piezoelectric positioners. Most lab microscopy need not be much faster than this, and oft-times much much slower is just fine. Microbio friends confirmed in conversing that they would be overjoyed with a deep-submicron optical imaging microscope that could produce a clear image in less than a minute. Especially if the "hi res" was a "button press" feature on what otherwise would be a regular scope. Or even "buttonless" - where moving the sample around would accumulate low-res images, and then when left stationary ... the high res would automatically begin to accumulate.
Sounds pretty useful to me.
GoatGuy