<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Next Big Future - Latest Comments in Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/interstellar_space_travel_projection_needs_comparable_advances_in_all_areas/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-12815364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SPACE-TIME CONSIDERATION 2009-&lt;br&gt;A suitable destination in-space (galaxy) similar to that of the milky-way galaxy would have to be found. Where a possible and probable livable planet similar to earth which  could sustain the occupants of that spacecraft., assuming that the mission would be at all possible. The propulsion system design would have to be advanced and revolutionary beyond any current design concept ever achieved on this earth., up until 1969  Saturn booster rockets of the design that were capable of landing a man on earths moon would have to be improved on by about 1000 per cent in my opinion. Where in the universe would that destination be? Once a suitable destination could be conceived of which could be designated at over 80-85 per cent certain then designing the spaceship to go there and the time-line requirement to achieve that would then have to be considered. The question is time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">studentofphysics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-11663395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i like poo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ALL OF YOU ARE MURDERS&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LOLOLOLOLOLOL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I TOUCH MYSELF IN &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pooooo3</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:40:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-8559932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;However, the realm of the comets and nearby interstellar space are within reach. And using projections of current solar photon sail technology, travel to ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cci-exchange.com/abroad/volunteer_abroad.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cci-exchange.com/abroad/volunteer_abroad.shtml"&gt;Volunteer Argentina&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnjonatan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-6706762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A multi-generational 40 year mission to the stars is perfectly practical, and indeed the time-frame for such a mission has already been reached by robotic missions that are still active.  The Voyager spacecraft are still very functional, nearly that old, and have outlived their expected life times by decades.  Pioneer 10 lasted 30 years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A mission of that length with humans on board is entirely another matter....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smallgrassyhill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:53:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-1714575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These technologies options sound to me you will need to be at least a Class I civilization which we are even in best predictions around 80-90 years away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DrBalthar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:05:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-1713475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Everything becomes a whole lot easier if we are willing to keep the craft mass down and accept a longer travel time.  Longer travel times necessitates that the mission serve a preservation-of-the-human-species purpose.  Low mass and long travel times means that those humans should be in the form of frozen embryos with stem cell uterus &amp;amp; blood, artificial gestation, and childrearing.  It all gets a bit weird but closer to the technology and finances that we have now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnHunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:45:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-1712199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Makes beamed propulsion seem a much better option doesn't it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qraal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:23:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-1706525</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I expect to see a dramatic increase in our understanding of our universe/multiverse when CERN starts experiments on September  tenth. At the very least it will show us what is or is not possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tjgreen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interstellar space travel prediction needs comparable advances in all areas</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/08/interstellar-space-travel-projection.html#comment-1705753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Futurepundit discussion of the Wired article here: &lt;a href="http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/005468.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/005468.html"&gt;http://www.futurepundit.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Barry a physics breakthrough on the "warp drive" front, I expect it will always be too expensive to accelerate a human body to 0.1c or faster. It's just cheaper to send an image of the mind and instructions for making a new body from local materials; sort of a von Neumann probe/Genesis Device combo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brock</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:20:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>