<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Next Big Future - Latest Comments in IEC Fusion Follow up Funding is in Motion</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/iec_fusion_follow_up_funding_is_in_motion/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:43:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: IEC Fusion Follow up Funding is in Motion</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/10/iec-fusion-follow-up-funding-is-in.html#comment-3406807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M. Simon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:43:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IEC Fusion Follow up Funding is in Motion</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/10/iec-fusion-follow-up-funding-is-in.html#comment-3401897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe an indeterminate size is evidence past experiments did not verify the scaling laws as expected. Perhaps the device will work after all, but not as anticipated. Cheap energy is still a possibility, but perhaps not cheap space flight?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eternalcarrot</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:24:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>