<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Next Big Future - Latest Comments in Dwave Quantum Computer Performance Estimates and Calculations</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/dwave_quantum_computer_performance_estimates_and_calculations/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:07:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dwave Quantum Computer Performance Estimates and Calculations</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/12/dwave-quantum-computer-performance.html#comment-4111528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We will have to wait a few more months to see the results of the various AQC performance analysis and actual experimental measurements. Plus there could be some useful problems where AQC can get a useful performance edge (machine learning or the glass problem).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dwave is still refining their qubits and their system design and scaling up the qubits. So the good news is as that there should be solid progress on AQC performance and performance predictions as more actual experience is gained with these AQC systems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nextbigfuture</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:07:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dwave Quantum Computer Performance Estimates and Calculations</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/12/dwave-quantum-computer-performance.html#comment-4091381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that is unfortunate.  7 years is a very long time in the world of technology.  sounds like they are giving themselves plenty of time to do lots of research without accomplishing anything...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">enantiomer2000</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:47:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>