<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Next Big Future - Latest Comments in Direct Conversion of Nuclear Power to Electricity and Powerplant Efficiency Review</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://nextbigfuture.disqus.com/direct_conversion_of_nuclear_power_to_electricity_and_powerplant_efficiency_review/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:42:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Direct Conversion of Nuclear Power to Electricity and Powerplant Efficiency Review</title><link>http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/04/direct-conversion-of-nuclear-power-to.html#comment-9547702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You should note that a high temperature gas turbine could also be the bottom cycle for this concept thus giving a total system efficiency potentially up to 73%.  PIDEC has no moving parts and the exhaust gas temperature is high so adding a gas turban to the bottom cycle of a PIDEC system would not be complicated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertVT</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:42:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>